Difference between revisions of "Semantic Gerrymandering"
From civicintelligence
(→(1) Description of the pattern) |
(→(1) Description of the pattern) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====(1) Description of the pattern==== | ====(1) Description of the pattern==== | ||
| − | Just a thought, Gerrymandering could be looked at as a person or a body of people or any organizations that represents special interest, bending or distorting rules, laws or guidelines for the | + | Just a thought, Gerrymandering could be looked at as a person or a body of people or any organizations that represents special interest, bending or distorting rules, laws or guidelines for the sake of profit or power. |
====(2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)==== | ====(2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)==== | ||
| + | We would like to think that we set up a society were everyone is equal under the law. To rename or reliable something for the pursuit of wealth or power, or to use your influence to bend the rules to attain results based on self can be classified as gerrymandering. Were this could be viewed practically dangerous is when we discuses bad motives for good ones. "Examples later." | ||
Latest revision as of 18:16, 1 May 2013
(1) Description of the pattern
Just a thought, Gerrymandering could be looked at as a person or a body of people or any organizations that represents special interest, bending or distorting rules, laws or guidelines for the sake of profit or power.
(2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)
We would like to think that we set up a society were everyone is equal under the law. To rename or reliable something for the pursuit of wealth or power, or to use your influence to bend the rules to attain results based on self can be classified as gerrymandering. Were this could be viewed practically dangerous is when we discuses bad motives for good ones. "Examples later."
