Difference between revisions of "Measures for Collective Intelligence"
From civicintelligence
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span style="color:purple;">Here we are focusing on collective — not <em>civic</em> — intelligence. | <span style="color:purple;">Here we are focusing on collective — not <em>civic</em> — intelligence. | ||
| − | Everybody should propose at least one type of <em>collectivity</em> and three or more attributes that help | + | Everybody should propose at least one type of <em>collectivity</em> and three or more attributes that you believe might help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here — these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also add attributes that think might not be relevant (see below)</span> |
| − | ==== | + | ====Small groups (according to Woolley et al)==== |
* social sensitivity | * social sensitivity | ||
* number of females in group | * number of females in group | ||
| − | <b>Factors ''not'' associated with intelligence</b> | + | |
| + | <b>Factors ''not'' associated with intelligence of ''small groups''</b> | ||
*group cohesion | *group cohesion | ||
====Married Couple (or equivalent)==== | ====Married Couple (or equivalent)==== | ||
| − | * ability to discuss things calmly and come to | + | * ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions |
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
* knowledge of each other's skills | * knowledge of each other's skills | ||
* ability to read each other's signals and react quickly | * ability to read each other's signals and react quickly | ||
| − | * good | + | * good all around skills |
====Seminar Group==== | ====Seminar Group==== | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 18 October 2011
Here we are focusing on collective — not civic — intelligence.
Everybody should propose at least one type of collectivity and three or more attributes that you believe might help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here — these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also add attributes that think might not be relevant (see below)
Contents
Small groups (according to Woolley et al)
- social sensitivity
- number of females in group
Factors not associated with intelligence of small groups
- group cohesion
Married Couple (or equivalent)
- ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions
Basketball Team
- knowledge of each other's skills
- ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
- good all around skills
Seminar Group
- ability to build on each other's comments —and slow hunches
