Difference between revisions of "Measures for Collective Intelligence"
From civicintelligence
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span style="color:purple;">Here we are focusing on collective — not <em>civic</em> — intelligence. | <span style="color:purple;">Here we are focusing on collective — not <em>civic</em> — intelligence. | ||
| − | Everybody should | + | Everybody should contribute at least one type of <em>collectivity</em> to this page. Everybody should add three or more attributes ''to any of the listed collectivities'' that you believe might help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here — these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also add attributes that think might not be relevant (see below)</span> |
====Small groups (according to Woolley et al)==== | ====Small groups (according to Woolley et al)==== | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 18 October 2011
Here we are focusing on collective — not civic — intelligence.
Everybody should contribute at least one type of collectivity to this page. Everybody should add three or more attributes to any of the listed collectivities that you believe might help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here — these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also add attributes that think might not be relevant (see below)
Contents
Small groups (according to Woolley et al)
- social sensitivity
- number of females in group
Factors not associated with intelligence of small groups
- group cohesion
Married Couple (or equivalent)
- ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions
Basketball Team
- knowledge of each other's skills
- ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
- good all around skills
Seminar Group
- ability to build on each other's comments —and slow hunches
