Difference between revisions of "Measures for Collective Intelligence"
(→Distributed Research and Action Network) |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<span style="color:green;">Dynamics: </span> | <span style="color:green;">Dynamics: </span> | ||
* social sensitivity | * social sensitivity | ||
− | * number of females in group | + | * number of females in group (may be subsumed by "social sensitivity" score |
* disregard to individual levels of general intelligence | * disregard to individual levels of general intelligence | ||
* equality/mediation of voices | * equality/mediation of voices | ||
− | <b>Attributes ''not'' | + | <b>Attributes ''not'' highly correlated with intelligence of ''small groups''</b> |
*group cohesion | *group cohesion | ||
+ | *average IQ of team members | ||
+ | *motivation of team members | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Civic Intelligence Research and Action Laboratory==== | ||
+ | <span style="color:blue;">Challenges: | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | *maintain long-term, effective relationships | ||
+ | |||
+ | <span style="color:purple;">Attributes / Measurements: </span> | ||
+ | *ability to | ||
+ | *diversity of portfolio (not too small or too large) | ||
+ | *number of committed students (should define "committed") | ||
+ | *number of committed faculty | ||
+ | *administrative support | ||
+ | * | ||
+ | |||
====Married Couple (or equivalent)==== | ====Married Couple (or equivalent)==== | ||
<span style="color:blue;">Challenges: | <span style="color:blue;">Challenges: | ||
</span> | </span> | ||
− | * | + | *Maintaining commitment |
− | * | + | *Maintaining responsibility |
− | * | + | *Maintaining restraint |
− | * | + | *Maintaining tolerance |
*Establishing priorities | *Establishing priorities | ||
Line 44: | Line 60: | ||
* ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions | * ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions | ||
* ability to empathize with each other's emotions so as to understand each other's needs | * ability to empathize with each other's emotions so as to understand each other's needs | ||
− | * mutual property | + | * mutual property (ability to recognize mutual property? ability to respect mutual property? Or ???) |
+ | |||
+ | ====Professional Sports Teams (While playing their sport, e.g. basketball) ==== | ||
+ | <span style="color:blue;">Challenges: | ||
+ | </span> | ||
+ | *trying to score more baskets by the end of the game | ||
+ | |||
+ | <span style="color:purple;">Attributes: </span> | ||
+ | * knowledge of each other's skills | ||
+ | * ability to read each other's signals and react quickly | ||
+ | * utilizing all team members effectively | ||
+ | * good all around skills | ||
+ | *Adequate Funding | ||
+ | *Regulations for Honesty | ||
+ | *Public Support | ||
+ | *Successful coaching | ||
− | ====Professional Sports Teams==== | + | ====Professional Sports Teams (administratively) ==== |
<span style="color:blue;">Challenges: | <span style="color:blue;">Challenges: | ||
</span> | </span> |
Revision as of 14:55, 21 October 2011
Here we are focusing on collective — not civic — intelligence.
Everybody should contribute at least one type of collectivity to this page. Everybody should add three or more attributes to any of the listed collectivities that you believe might help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here — these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also add attributes that think might not be relevant (see below)
Small groups (according to Woolley et al)
Challenges:
- solving visual puzzles
- brainstorming
- making collective moral decisions
- negotiating over limited resources
Attributes:
- Supports a manageable formation of participants
- Less resistance to change
- Less space required
- More space for innovation
- Community building
- Addresses shared concerns and common objectives
Dynamics:
- social sensitivity
- number of females in group (may be subsumed by "social sensitivity" score
- disregard to individual levels of general intelligence
- equality/mediation of voices
Attributes not highly correlated with intelligence of small groups
- group cohesion
- average IQ of team members
- motivation of team members
Civic Intelligence Research and Action Laboratory
Challenges:
- maintain long-term, effective relationships
Attributes / Measurements:
- ability to
- diversity of portfolio (not too small or too large)
- number of committed students (should define "committed")
- number of committed faculty
- administrative support
Married Couple (or equivalent)
Challenges:
- Maintaining commitment
- Maintaining responsibility
- Maintaining restraint
- Maintaining tolerance
- Establishing priorities
Attributes:
- ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions
- ability to empathize with each other's emotions so as to understand each other's needs
- mutual property (ability to recognize mutual property? ability to respect mutual property? Or ???)
Professional Sports Teams (While playing their sport, e.g. basketball)
Challenges:
- trying to score more baskets by the end of the game
Attributes:
- knowledge of each other's skills
- ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
- utilizing all team members effectively
- good all around skills
- Adequate Funding
- Regulations for Honesty
- Public Support
- Successful coaching
Professional Sports Teams (administratively)
Challenges:
- Technological Advantages
- Brand Management
- Reputation
- Injuries
- Politics
- Recruitment
- Inadequate coaching
Attributes:
- knowledge of each other's skills
- ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
- good all around skills
- Adequate Funding
- Regulations for Honesty
- Public Support
- Successful coaching
Seminar Group
Challenges:
- Collective Social Sensitivity
- Establishing a framework for effective communication
- Distinguishing between fact and opinion
Attributes:
- ability to build on each other's comments —and slow hunches
- opportunities to test and identify dynamics of collective intelligence
- opportunities to stimulate the spread of memes.
Occupy Wall Street groups
Challenges:
- Identifying a Collective Purpose
- Agreeing on Pragmatic Statements, Chants, and Slogans
- Planning for police intervention
- Informally electing a civilian to facilitate movement/action through speech
- Informing uninformed participants of the purpose of the gathering
Attributes:
- Influential Public Demonstrations
- Participatory Democracy
- Civil Activism
- Inertia of Ideas
Contributors to a Wiki Page
Challenges:
- Learning to navigate throughout the wiki
- Editing/Trimming
- Developing pages without excessive repetition
Attributes:
- ability to build on each other's comments (similar to Seminar Group)
- place to compile online resources
- rewards of creating a "Liquid Network of Ideas." -(Steven Johnson)
Distributed Research and Action Network
Challenges:
- Coordination
- Communication
- Managing of Distribution
- Creating a Commons
- Shared Language(s) and Lingo(s)
- Describing transcendant goals
- Keeping things fresh
- Translating abstract thought from mind to mind and putting it into practice
- Acting as communication facilitators for each other
- Recognizing emergent phenomena and giving it a place
Attributes:
- Flexible
- Free-flowing information
- Synergy
- High Creative Output
- Redundancy in Network Architecture
School District in Economically Disadvantaged Location
Challenges:
- Distribution of limited resources
- Lack of Family/Community support
- Language Barrier
- Dropout Rates
- No Child Left Behind
Attributes:
- Connecting the Schools with the Communities
- Impressionability of the Youth
- Educators who are willing to work for change
- Alternative Education System
Sales Crew (General Employee Teams in Business)
Challenges:
- Assigning roles
- Developing problem solving strategies
- "Establishing ownership of common objectives" -(http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/corporate-team-building.html).
- Implementing marketing/advertising tactics
- Time management
Attributes:
- Increased Sales?
Dynamics:
- Workspace
- Tech Tools
- Roles and Responsibilities
- Social Skills
- Flexibility
- Group Synergy
Ultimately we could use these to help us actually measure collective intelligence.