Difference between revisions of "Opacity"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[File:320px-Weathered_bricks_near_the_Albert_Dock_1.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
====Description==== | ====Description==== | ||
This pattern means that important information is kept secret from citizens. This is useful when hiding corruption, nepotism, money laundering, smuggling, vote buying, tax evasion, etc. When information is kept private there is less chance that malfeasance can be noticed. With Opacity in place, over the years elite business and governments can distance themselves further and further away from any controls on them. | This pattern means that important information is kept secret from citizens. This is useful when hiding corruption, nepotism, money laundering, smuggling, vote buying, tax evasion, etc. When information is kept private there is less chance that malfeasance can be noticed. With Opacity in place, over the years elite business and governments can distance themselves further and further away from any controls on them. | ||
Revision as of 10:26, 3 June 2013
Description
This pattern means that important information is kept secret from citizens. This is useful when hiding corruption, nepotism, money laundering, smuggling, vote buying, tax evasion, etc. When information is kept private there is less chance that malfeasance can be noticed. With Opacity in place, over the years elite business and governments can distance themselves further and further away from any controls on them.
Opacity prevents people from seeing how business and governments actually conduct their affairs. This encourages corruption because there is no oversight.
It can also establish this as a habit which ultimately can be seen as the "natural state of affairs", the way things are actually supposed to be.
How it works
Keeping things from the public eye can be maintained through laws or habit. Sometimes when there are transparency laws, a government can designate things to be secret in order to maintain state security.
Links
This pattern is strongly linked to corruption patterns. It's really the handmaiden to corruption.
This pattern also could link to toothless journalism and to laws against activist or muckraking journalism. With the right type of laws, it would be easy to jail journalists for "slander" if they suggest that there might be malfeasance behind the closed doors — even if it happens to be true!
References
Notes and Suggestions
It is interesting to note that even if there is transparency, societal apathy can mean that corruption and other crimes can continue without interruption.
