Difference between revisions of "Civic Intelligence as Professional Practice"

From civicintelligence
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Bhutan - Gross National Happiness| Gross National Happiness in Bhutan]] (seems like a good one to address in this chapter!)
 
[[Bhutan - Gross National Happiness| Gross National Happiness in Bhutan]] (seems like a good one to address in this chapter!)
  
The template for the basic "perspective" chapter follows this paragraph. The original template (possibly revised) is in [[Introduction_to_Section_II]].  (After the chapter is further along — and the template structure is more-or-less finalized, we can remove this extra verbiage.)
 
  
The basic Plan has four parts:
+
It looks like the broad areas within this perspective are: organizational development, policy, and governance...
  
(1) A Introduction to the perspective
 
  
(2) One or more case studies that show different facets of this perspective. Our decision was, as much as it's possible, not to artificially separate thinking and doing. At the same time we do want to present a variety of approaches, some of which will be better suited for think-work and some will be better suited for action (that plays out in the "real" (or material?) world.
+
== Introduction to Civic Intelligence as Professional Practice ==
 +
 
 +
== Case Studies ==
  
 
*How can we organize a deliberation process that matters and avoid ineffective talking without any results?

 
*How can we organize a deliberation process that matters and avoid ineffective talking without any results?

 
:The first thing we have to do is try. To some degree this is a design process — which is something that academics often eschew. I'd also characterize the work that I'd like to see as being experimental and constructive. I believe that we need to build, somewhat gradually and piecemeal, deliberative systems at the same time that we're building deliberative cultures. 'References: [[Doug Schuler | Schuler, D.]] (2011). Deliberation That Matters -- From Krems, Austria" Posted by House
 
:The first thing we have to do is try. To some degree this is a design process — which is something that academics often eschew. I'd also characterize the work that I'd like to see as being experimental and constructive. I believe that we need to build, somewhat gradually and piecemeal, deliberative systems at the same time that we're building deliberative cultures. 'References: [[Doug Schuler | Schuler, D.]] (2011). Deliberation That Matters -- From Krems, Austria" Posted by House
  
(3) Conclusions
+
==Conclusions==
  
(4) Finally, a section that includes text book like end-of-chapter exercises, questions for the student, suggested activities, etc.
+
==For Future Exploration==
 
+
 
+
It looks like the broad areas within this perspective are: organizational development, policy, and governance...
+

Revision as of 13:43, 25 May 2011

Examples of civic intelligence at the level of government: Gross National Happiness in Bhutan (seems like a good one to address in this chapter!)


It looks like the broad areas within this perspective are: organizational development, policy, and governance...


Introduction to Civic Intelligence as Professional Practice

Case Studies

  • How can we organize a deliberation process that matters and avoid ineffective talking without any results?

The first thing we have to do is try. To some degree this is a design process — which is something that academics often eschew. I'd also characterize the work that I'd like to see as being experimental and constructive. I believe that we need to build, somewhat gradually and piecemeal, deliberative systems at the same time that we're building deliberative cultures. 'References: Schuler, D. (2011). Deliberation That Matters -- From Krems, Austria" Posted by House

Conclusions

For Future Exploration