Difference between revisions of "Discussions and Proposals"

From civicintelligence
(How should we structure the information in the book?)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
=== How should we structure the information in the book? ===
 
=== How should we structure the information in the book? ===
*I think that the start of each section should have a SeeMe to give a visual description of what is going to follow.
+
*<strong>I think that the start of each section should have a SeeMe to give a visual description of what is going to follow.</strong>
** Sounds like an interesting idea, are you thinking that the SeeMe model would describe in some way a particular case study?  Would each chapter than be focused on ''examples'' of "Civic Intelligence"?
+
  
=== Perhaps we should work in teams to develop possible outlines? ===
+
:Sounds like an interesting idea, are you thinking that the SeeMe model would describe in some way a particular case study?  Would each chapter than be focused on ''examples'' of "Civic Intelligence"?
  
==I think getting into teams sounds like a good idea because I don't see the majority of the class (myself included) doing much on their own. I find myself being completely lost and not knowing how to start but with a group we would all be supported in our ideas and sorta forced into action making progress actually happen on here.==
+
: I think that the SeeMe model can describe a process of any kind, so not just case studies. I am working on my SeeMe for my case study, and have been experimenting by writing SeeMe models for other aspects. I think this model could work for the constituents.
* Interesting idea Vera!  Maybe we could allocate part of a Saturday to do just that.
+
<hr>
===Proposal For Chapter===
+
* <strong>Perhaps we should work in teams to develop possible outlines?</strong>
===I am interested in the moment that an individual, or group, makes the choice to actively do something to create a measurable change in their community. What led to that action? What made them commit? I am proposing a section where people are interviewed and asked about this process. For me, the measurement of civic intelligence is through observing action within a community. This is a seed of an idea that I am still fleshing out but I wanted to put it out to the group. I would be very interested in the process of interviewing others.===
+
 
 +
: I think getting into teams sounds like a good idea because I don't see the majority of the class (myself included) doing much on their own. I find myself being completely lost and not knowing how to start but with a group we would all be supported in our ideas and sorta forced into action making progress actually happen on here.
 +
::Interesting idea Vera!  Maybe we could allocate part of a Saturday to do just that.
 +
<hr>
 +
 
 +
[[Seminar]]

Latest revision as of 06:43, 12 May 2011

This is where we can discuss what we'd like to do next.


How should we structure the information in the book?

  • I think that the start of each section should have a SeeMe to give a visual description of what is going to follow.
Sounds like an interesting idea, are you thinking that the SeeMe model would describe in some way a particular case study? Would each chapter than be focused on examples of "Civic Intelligence"?
I think that the SeeMe model can describe a process of any kind, so not just case studies. I am working on my SeeMe for my case study, and have been experimenting by writing SeeMe models for other aspects. I think this model could work for the constituents.

  • Perhaps we should work in teams to develop possible outlines?
I think getting into teams sounds like a good idea because I don't see the majority of the class (myself included) doing much on their own. I find myself being completely lost and not knowing how to start but with a group we would all be supported in our ideas and sorta forced into action making progress actually happen on here.
Interesting idea Vera! Maybe we could allocate part of a Saturday to do just that.

Seminar