Difference between revisions of "Eye for an Eye – Retribution"

From civicintelligence
(Evidence)
m
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[File:512PX-~1.jpg|thumb|300px|Painting depicting retribution-where everyone gets stabbed]]
 +
 
==== Description of the pattern====
 
==== Description of the pattern====
  
Equivalent exchange by way of exact behavior. There is no need to "be the better person" because you will be the only one. Doing unto others the same as has been done unto you is true balance.
+
Equivalent exchange by way of exact behavior. There is no need to "be the better person" because you will be the only one. This is the idea that, "doing unto others the same as has been done unto you," is the true balance of justice.
 
+
==== Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)====
+
  
 
This pattern upholds the running behavior that seems to underline a lot of society. The idea of "Returning the Favor" has evolved and resides in the shadows along with most hidden agendas (see hidden agendas). By keeping a "laser pointer" on the simplicity of what it is in any form, eye for an eye can never truly loose it's muster. It is "instant gratification" the current moment- which is important when there is a demand for quick respond.
 
This pattern upholds the running behavior that seems to underline a lot of society. The idea of "Returning the Favor" has evolved and resides in the shadows along with most hidden agendas (see hidden agendas). By keeping a "laser pointer" on the simplicity of what it is in any form, eye for an eye can never truly loose it's muster. It is "instant gratification" the current moment- which is important when there is a demand for quick respond.
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==== How it Works ====
 
==== How it Works ====
  
Eye for an Eye is, in it's purest form, doing exactly what is done to other party that has been done to them. Example: to kill another is to be punished by death. As time as passes, the way in which it may manifest can vary. This is due to the complexities of society. The idea dates back to biblical times- See Matthew 5:38 (king James Version).
+
Eye for an Eye is, in it's purest form, doing exactly what is done to other party that has been done to them. Example: to kill another is to be punished by death. As time as passes, the way in which it may manifest can vary. This is due to the complexities of society. The idea dates back to biblical times- See Matthew 5:38 (King James Version).
  
 
==== Evidence ====
 
==== Evidence ====
 
+
Mutually assured destruction: I.e. Policies on nuclear warfare, Hatfield and McCoy Feud that lasted (1862-1891)
George W. Bush using the fact of an attempted assassination of his father as motivation to continue a war path.
+
  
 
==== Linked patterns ====
 
==== Linked patterns ====
  
[[Hidden Agendas]]
+
[[Hidden Agendas]] [[Violence]]
 +
 
 +
==== References ====
 +
 
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction Mutual Assured Destruction]
 +
 
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatfield-McCoy_feud Hatfield-McCoy Feud]
  
==== Resources ====
+
<references/>

Latest revision as of 17:47, 26 February 2014

Painting depicting retribution-where everyone gets stabbed

Description of the pattern

Equivalent exchange by way of exact behavior. There is no need to "be the better person" because you will be the only one. This is the idea that, "doing unto others the same as has been done unto you," is the true balance of justice.

This pattern upholds the running behavior that seems to underline a lot of society. The idea of "Returning the Favor" has evolved and resides in the shadows along with most hidden agendas (see hidden agendas). By keeping a "laser pointer" on the simplicity of what it is in any form, eye for an eye can never truly loose it's muster. It is "instant gratification" the current moment- which is important when there is a demand for quick respond.

How it Works

Eye for an Eye is, in it's purest form, doing exactly what is done to other party that has been done to them. Example: to kill another is to be punished by death. As time as passes, the way in which it may manifest can vary. This is due to the complexities of society. The idea dates back to biblical times- See Matthew 5:38 (King James Version).

Evidence

Mutually assured destruction: I.e. Policies on nuclear warfare, Hatfield and McCoy Feud that lasted (1862-1891)

Linked patterns

Hidden Agendas Violence

References

Mutual Assured Destruction

Hatfield-McCoy Feud