Difference between revisions of "Measures for Collective Intelligence"
From civicintelligence
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Everybody should propose at least one type of <em>collectivity</em> and three or more attributes that help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few exampled of each. Don't worry if you're not certain — these are hypotheses!</span> | Everybody should propose at least one type of <em>collectivity</em> and three or more attributes that help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few exampled of each. Don't worry if you're not certain — these are hypotheses!</span> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Groups (according to Woolley et al)==== | ||
===Married Couple (or equivalent)=== | ===Married Couple (or equivalent)=== | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 18 October 2011
Here we are focusing on collective — not civic — intelligence.
Everybody should propose at least one type of collectivity and three or more attributes that help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few exampled of each. Don't worry if you're not certain — these are hypotheses!
Contents
Groups (according to Woolley et al)
Married Couple (or equivalent)
- ability to discuss things calmly and come to a conclusion
Basketball Team
- knowledge of each other's skills
- ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
- good all around skills
Seminar Group
- ability to build on each other's comments —and slow hunches
