Difference between revisions of "Measures for Collective Intelligence"
From civicintelligence
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
====Groups (according to Woolley et al)==== | ====Groups (according to Woolley et al)==== | ||
| + | * social sensitivity | ||
| + | * number of females in group | ||
| − | ===Married Couple (or equivalent)=== | + | <b>Factors ''not'' associated with intelligence</b> |
| + | *group cohesion | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Married Couple (or equivalent)==== | ||
* ability to discuss things calmly and come to a conclusion | * ability to discuss things calmly and come to a conclusion | ||
| − | ===Basketball Team=== | + | ====Basketball Team==== |
* knowledge of each other's skills | * knowledge of each other's skills | ||
* ability to read each other's signals and react quickly | * ability to read each other's signals and react quickly | ||
* good all around skills | * good all around skills | ||
| − | ===Seminar Group=== | + | ====Seminar Group==== |
*ability to build on each other's comments —and ''slow hunches'' | *ability to build on each other's comments —and ''slow hunches'' | ||
| − | ===Occupy Wall Street groups=== | + | ====Occupy Wall Street groups==== |
| − | ===Distributed Research and Action Network=== | + | ====Distributed Research and Action Network==== |
| − | ===School District in Economically Disadvantaged Location=== | + | ====School District in Economically Disadvantaged Location==== |
Revision as of 16:29, 18 October 2011
Here we are focusing on collective — not civic — intelligence.
Everybody should propose at least one type of collectivity and three or more attributes that help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few exampled of each. Don't worry if you're not certain — these are hypotheses!
Contents
[hide]Groups (according to Woolley et al)
- social sensitivity
- number of females in group
Factors not associated with intelligence
- group cohesion
Married Couple (or equivalent)
- ability to discuss things calmly and come to a conclusion
Basketball Team
- knowledge of each other's skills
- ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
- good all around skills
Seminar Group
- ability to build on each other's comments —and slow hunches
