Difference between revisions of "Measures for Collective Intelligence"

From civicintelligence
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<span style="color:purple;">Here we are  focusing on collective &mdash; not  <em>civic</em> &mdash;  intelligence.
 
<span style="color:purple;">Here we are  focusing on collective &mdash; not  <em>civic</em> &mdash;  intelligence.
  
Everybody should propose at least one type of  <em>collectivity</em> and three or more attributes that help make that  collectivity intelligent.  I've listed a few exampled of each. Don't worry if you're not certain &mdash; these are hypotheses!</span>
+
Everybody should propose at least one type of  <em>collectivity</em> and three or more attributes that you believe might help make that  collectivity intelligent.  I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here &mdash; these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also  add attributes that think  might not  be relevant (see below)</span>
  
====Groups (according  to Woolley et al)====
+
====Small groups (according  to Woolley et al)====
 
* social  sensitivity
 
* social  sensitivity
 
*  number of females in group
 
*  number of females in group
  
<b>Factors ''not'' associated with intelligence</b>
+
 
 +
<b>Factors ''not'' associated with intelligence of  ''small groups''</b>
 
*group cohesion
 
*group cohesion
  
  
 
====Married Couple (or equivalent)====
 
====Married Couple (or equivalent)====
* ability to discuss things calmly and  come to a conclusion
+
* ability to discuss things calmly and  come to conclusions
  
  
Line 18: Line 19:
 
* knowledge of each other's skills
 
* knowledge of each other's skills
 
* ability to read each other's signals and react  quickly
 
* ability to read each other's signals and react  quickly
* good all around skills
+
* good all around skills
  
 
====Seminar  Group====
 
====Seminar  Group====

Revision as of 16:32, 18 October 2011

Here we are focusing on collective — not civic — intelligence.

Everybody should propose at least one type of collectivity and three or more attributes that you believe might help make that collectivity intelligent. I've listed a few examples of each. Don't worry if you're not certain about what you write here — these are just hypotheses! BTW, you can also add attributes that think might not be relevant (see below)

Small groups (according to Woolley et al)

  • social sensitivity
  • number of females in group


Factors not associated with intelligence of small groups

  • group cohesion


Married Couple (or equivalent)

  • ability to discuss things calmly and come to conclusions


Basketball Team

  • knowledge of each other's skills
  • ability to read each other's signals and react quickly
  • good all around skills

Seminar Group

  • ability to build on each other's comments —and slow hunches


Occupy Wall Street groups

Distributed Research and Action Network

School District in Economically Disadvantaged Location