Difference between revisions of "Weapons of Mass Distraction"

From civicintelligence
((2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad))
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
====(2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)====
 
====(2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)====
Cell phones, movies, sports, games, celebrities, Television, Music. etc, etc, etc. What do these things have in common? They are all possible distractions. Distractions can be useful and are possibly even necessary for human happiness, however they can also distract from other goals or areas of interest that could be addressed.
+
Cell phones, movies, sports, games, celebrity, Soap Operas, Music, war, holidays, reality TV shows, etc. What do these things have in common? They are all possible to use as Weapons of Mass Distraction. Distractions can be useful and are possibly even necessary for human happiness, however they can also distract people from other goals or areas of interest that could be addressed, most notably political, social, and human rights issues. Any country or entity that employs this tactic is essentially saying that an informed and motivated public is a dangerous thing and a distracted and apathetic public is much preferred.
  
 
==== (3) Evidence and Examples====
 
==== (3) Evidence and Examples====

Revision as of 13:40, 15 May 2013

(1) Description of the pattern

Societal distractions can be naturally occurring or manufactured in such a way as to distract people and subvert their attention away from social and civic duties to something more menial and possibly desirable.

(2) Why the pattern is good (i.e. bad)

Cell phones, movies, sports, games, celebrity, Soap Operas, Music, war, holidays, reality TV shows, etc. What do these things have in common? They are all possible to use as Weapons of Mass Distraction. Distractions can be useful and are possibly even necessary for human happiness, however they can also distract people from other goals or areas of interest that could be addressed, most notably political, social, and human rights issues. Any country or entity that employs this tactic is essentially saying that an informed and motivated public is a dangerous thing and a distracted and apathetic public is much preferred.

(3) Evidence and Examples