Standard 8
Contents
Standard Eight – Physical Resources
The College’s mission - to sustain a vibrant academic community and to offer students an education that will help them excel in their intellectual, creative, professional and community service goals – is directly affected by the ability of the College to provide modern or updated facilities for students, staff and faculty. The College has created a 10-year capital renewal plan which was recently updated in 2007. The College has aggressively pursued funding for renovating existing facilities and for a new instructional building during the past nine years. The funding has produced significant improvements in the capability of the College to teach and house its students and to provide appropriate space for the staff and faculty.
The Evergreen State College has experienced an exceptional amount of capital funding over the past nine years. The Washington State Legislature in collaboration with the Governor has made a cumulative investment of over $110 million to add new facilities, renovate facilities and reduce the maintenance backlog during these years.
The renovation of old space and addition of new space both for teaching/learning and working have enabled the College to maintain its reputation as one of the premier public liberal arts higher education institutions in the United States. The collaboration between the academic and administrative sides of the College has ensured that the needs of the learning part of the institution receive a high priority when the capital funding request is provided to the governor. The five foci, interdisciplinary education; linking theory and practice; teaching and learning across significant differences; personal engagement in learning; and, collaborative learning; play a definitive role in the development of the College’s physical resources by ensuring the engagement of the entire College community and sustaining the move towards a green and sustainable campus environment.
The adoption of a revised strategic plan for the College in 2007 and the expectation of declining capital funding were instrumental in the College’s decision to complete a new master plan for the next 15-20 years of College development. This master plan was designed to build on the policies established in the 1998 Master Plan and the 2005 revision, as well as the revised strategic plan and the mission/priorities elucidated in that plan. The College’s new Master Plan was developed with the extensive involvement of staff, students and faculty, as well as the external community. These groups participated throughout the development of the Master Plan via a wide variety of methods – charettes, meetings with designated units, staff, students, faculty, and the external community, an interactive web site, individual one-on-one meetings, open forums including our external community, and participation in the Synergy Conference. One of the prime considerations in the development of the facility master plan was to ensure that the plan provided for sustainable development of both the built and natural environments. Additionally, the consultant collaborated with the academic programs in providing students with the opportunity to participate in the master planning effort as “consultants”, project assistants, etc. This partnership was crucial in the development of the master plan, its presentation to the College community and Board of Trustees and final acceptance.
The College will need to continue to renovate and modernize its facilities. There will need to be even more collaboration between the academic and administrative units to ensure that the resources gleaned from the state are applied to the highest priority areas. It will be necessary to ensure that resources are provided to properly maintain the facilities to meet the changing requirements of the staff, faculty and students. There will be an increased interest in making the College a model for sustainability and ensuring that the capital projects reflect our goals in this area. The integration of old and new will require all to look for new ways to do business in the area of physical resources.
There is a strong indication that the future funding for capital projects may be reduced due to an expected decrease in state revenues. This reduction comes just as the programmed renovations of the 35-year old science facilities are half way complete. The potential decrease in capital funding from the state will require the College to be more aggressive in its presentation of the capital funding request in order to meet the state mandated increase in its offerings for science and mathematics. Additionally, the infrastructure of the buildings continues to age which requires more effort to ensure that the buildings are properly maintained and able to meet the demands of the students, staff and faculty.
One of the key projects was the construction of the new Seminar II facility completed in March 2004 at a cost of $45 million. This project added 198,775 square feet to the College’s inventory. This building is significant for several reasons: first, it was the first building at a state higher education institution to achieve a LEED Gold certification; second, it was the first new facility constructed at the College since the 1970’s; and, last the teaching spaces were designed to enhance and complement the teaching style of the College.
Another large project was the major renovation of the largest facility on campus, the Daniel J. Evans Library (about 350,000 square feet at a cost of about $45 million). This renovation affected several key components of the College and is being accomplished in two phases. The first phase, B & C-wings, was completed in July 2006. This phase significantly improved the Library area, the academic computing area, and the media support center. The Library was expanded to provide additional space for the collection (including rare books), more resource space, to incorporate the Learning Center and to improve accessibility. The academic computing area expansion provided more laboratories for the various types of computers and software and increased the size of the common computer area. The media support center renovation has provided more teaching and learning spaces, additional room for media equipment (this is extensively used by students in their various programs) and better support space for the staff.
Also during this time the College was funded to renovate Lab II first floor and third floor and Lab I first floor. These renovations were critical since the work provided modern laboratory space to meet the changing needs in the various programs. The lab renovations also allowed the faculty to ensure that the space would be multi-disciplinary, corresponding more directly to the pedagogy practiced at the College. Additionally, the state has provided funding ($1.7 million) for renovation and expansion of the College’s singularly unique facility, the Longhouse. The Longhouse renovation and expansion will improve the capability of this facility to house its programs and staff and to meet the increase demand on the facility from both the Native American constituents and regular College programs. The state in conjunction with the students has provided funding for the renovation and expansion of the Campus Activities Building. This project is also unique in that it combines funding provided by the state for renovation work ($4.9 million) with bond funds secured by a per quarter unit fee ($5.25 per unit), voted and approved by the students, which provides another $16 million for expansion and additional renovation of this facility. The design of this project began in September 2007 and is expected to be complete by December 2008/January 2009 with construction to begin in April 2009 and be completed by August 2010.
There has been a revenue bond program of approximately $6.4 million in the Residential and Dining Services area which has re-roofed 17 residential units, provided new kitchen equipment, renovated space in the high rise residential units, modernized the elevators and updated the fire alarm system and installed sprinklers in these same units. These significant investments along with other capital funding during the past nine years are having a positive effect on the academic and student life programs.
In addition to the major capital funding received from the state the College has received significant continued funding for deferred maintenance in the areas of health, safety and code compliance; facilities preservation; and, infrastructure preservation. Over the past nine years the College has received over $33 million in order to reduce this deferred maintenance backlog. Major work has been done on most of the building roofs, the data network infrastructure, roads and those buildings and areas not impacted by major capital projects.
8A – Instructional and Support Facilities
8.A.1- The addition of the Seminar II Building to the College’s inventory in 2004 provided the first new teaching spaces to the College’s inventory since its inception. The number of teaching spaces went from 2769 student stations to 3085 student stations when the building was completed. The provision of these spaces is making it possible to do the major renovations throughout the College without reducing the College’s ability to provide teaching space for its current enrollment. Additionally, as more emphasis has been placed on science and math curriculum the College has begun a systematic renovation of the two Lab buildings. This ensures that the facilities will be available to meet this increased need. The Lab buildings are being renovated a floor at a time during the summer, primarily to ameliorate the impact of the temporary loss of laboratory space. The existing classroom and laboratory inventory is adequate to meet the College’s targeted enrollment of 5,000 FTE. However, while there is sufficient classroom and laboratory space, many of the spaces are outdated and need renovation to be able to more adequately support the College’s pedagogy.
8.A.2- In general the facilities provided for instructional use are adequate. Though, as stated before, many of the spaces are outdated and not as electronically sophisticated as necessary for the use of electronic media. There is a plan to renovate and modernize the remaining instructional space over the next 10 years. In the case of the Lab buildings, it is necessary to do the renovations floor by floor in order to ensure the availability of laboratory space during the normal school year. The renovation of the Lab building space is especially critical for two reasons: first, the increased emphasis on science and math education; and, second, the need to update the existing laboratories to be able to provide facilities that reflect current, and, in some cases, state of the art technologies. The other four buildings scheduled for renovation, Seminar I, Communications, Campus Recreation Center, and the Lecture Halls, which are able to provide for the general instructional function are between 30-35 years old now and need modernization of not only the instructional space but also the general infrastructure. These facilities are scheduled for modernization throughout the next 10 years which means some of them will be almost 50 years old before they are modernized. The College has been able to secure capital funding for small repair and improvement projects to help with the modernization of various rooms and spaces to meet new program needs or to improve the existing capability of the space. These funds averaged about $560,000 over the last 10 years with amounts ranging from $100,000 in 1999-2001 biennium to $930,000 in 2007-2009 biennium. These funds enabled the College to provide de-ionized water to laboratories, a modern dance floor, improved restroom facilities, and other similar types of renovations and upgrades.
8.A.3- The College has made a commitment to ensure that the facilities are furnished and equipped adequately for all aspects of College life. All capital projects have funds designated for furniture as well as equipment. The College expended $_____________ in FY _____. The College has also provided $6,746,000 for the new Seminar II building; $1,147,000 in Daniel J. Evans Library Modernization, Phase I; in Lab II, 1st floor renovation, $_____, and 3rd floor renovation, $135,140; and $165,000 in Lab I, 1st floor renovation. Additionally, the College has budgeted $1.12 million for furniture and equipment in the Daniel J. Evans Library Modernization, Phase II project. Academics has been consistent in providing funding for furniture and equipment as part of the ongoing facilities modernization/renovation. From 1998-2007, the Academic division has provided $293,000 to ensure that those programs not affected by modernization or renovation were provided with the necessary furnishing to ensure that the space was effectively utilized by faculty, staff and students. Information regarding furnishings is provided from users and facility reviews on pending renovation or modernizations. While many spaces continue to operate effectively with decades old furniture, the College has committed to systematically reviewing the furnishings as part of the renovation and modernization of the facilities across campus per the College’s 10-year capital plan and Facility Master Plan.
Maintaining, replacing and procuring new instructional equipment is a constant challenge. Prioritization of expenditures is based on curricular need but is predominantly for the science laboratories and media. In support of academic programs, the College has a dedicated equipment fund of $250,000 per year. In addition, $225,000 from Summer School revenue is dedicated to the acquisition of computers, software and peripherals for faculty and academic staff. When a critical need arises, the Academic Division uses its reserves to purchase equipment. An example of this is $150,000 dedicated to purchase scientific instrumentation in order to equip the lab facilities created in the Lab I, 1st floor. Faculty, in collaboration with the Grants Office, write equipment grants to fund needed equipment that is beyond the means of the College; primarily scientific analytical equipment.
| Description | FY04 | FY05 | FY06 | FY07 |
| Instructional Equipment Expenditures | ||||
| Annual Equipment Budget | $199,456.49 | $221,430.47 | $253,295.44 | $237,217.66 |
| Academic Reserves | ||||
| Grants1 | $14,360.75 | $250,109.41 | $168,994.00 | $193,536.22 |
| Vans | $0 | $43,822.92 | $45,953.60 | $42,672.96 |
| Furniture Expenditures | $2,818.40 | $0 | $12,474.74 | $308,121.742 |
| Technology Expenditures | ||||
| Computers | $141,273.24 | |||
| Peripherals | $19,442.24 | |||
| Software | $38,700.52 |
1Academic Grants only
2Primarily supplement to Library Phase I furniture budget
8.A.4- In 2002, 2004 and, again in 2005 the State of Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) conducted studies testing methods to survey, assemble, convert and translate infrastructure and building renewal information. This comparable framework study provided information regarding the deferred maintenance issues for higher education in Washington. In the legislative session which concluded in April 2007, the Higher Education Coordinating Board (HECB) was given funding and the responsibility to update their comparable framework. The HECB has developed the methodology and schedule to complete this update by March 2008 with the final report issued in April 2008.
In order to provide a more detailed look at the College’s facilities the College contracted with Marx/Okubo Associates, Inc. in August of 2005 to do a detailed facility audit of all the state funded campus facilities and one residential facility. This facility audit used the methodology developed by JLARC. This audit indicated that the College’s facility condition index (FCI) was 10.9%. This index measures the maintenance backlog (preservation backlog) divided by the current replacement value of the College’s facilities. In comparison with the other 4-year institutions in Washington, TESC had the second lowest FCI of the six institutions with only the University of Washington having a lower FCI (10.3%).
This audit was completed in December 2005 and the results used to develop the minor works capital program for the 2007-2017 10-year capital plan and the capital request for the 2007-2009 biennium.
The resources necessary to operate and maintain instructional facilities are reviewed and updated in the budget process as necessary and within the College’s overall budget. An electronic work order system is used to track maintenance and repair issues. The College is currently inputting preventive maintenance data into the system which will allow us to monitor preventive maintenance and help identify high value systems that need to be replaced or over hauled. This information, along with the facility audit, enables the college to assign appropriate operation and maintenance resources.
The capital funding request requires that the College evaluate the need for additional operation and maintenance resources for any new construction that is requested. This requirement enables the College to secure the funding resources necessary to operate and maintain a new facility. The College, as does the state, expects any major renovation to make the facility more sustainable and decrease the utility and operational costs by providing when economically feasible, a more energy efficient system and facility.
8.A.5- TESC provides a portion of its capital budget specifically for health, safety and code compliance projects. One of the categories funded over the last two biennia has been to improve access by the physically disabled. The biennial capital request uses information provided by the College’s Access Services (part of Student and Academic Support Services), as well as, studies done in support of road renovation, and trail and sidewalk restoration projects. Health, safety, and code compliance, including accessibility requirements are integrated into major capital projects which involve renovation or modernization of the space.
The College uses the following statutory requirements in its facilities planning to ensure the health, safety and accessibility of the facility: Americans with Disabilities Act; Washington State Indoor Air Quality Code; Washington State Energy Code; International Building Code; Uniform Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Building Codes; National Electric Code; National Fire Protection Agency; Washington Department of Labor and Industries regulations, various Environmental Protection Agency regulations; and Occupational Safety and Health Agency regulations.
8.A.6- The College operates one off-site location that it leases in Tacoma. The Tacoma Campus is maintained and operated under the same regulations and guidelines for health, safety and disabled access as the campus in Olympia. This property was specifically renovated to house the programs currently offered when the College leased the facility in 2000. The College has one full time maintenance custodian assigned to handle minor maintenance and responds with staff from Olympia on major items that are the College’s responsibility under the lease. The property manager is responsive on those needs within the owner’s responsibility. The College ensures that the maintenance operations for this facility provide the necessary program support for the students, staff and faculty at this location.
8.A.7- The College provides additional off-site programs through its Reservation-Based Program. These programs are located in facilities at various First People’s locations in western Washington. These programs receive support from the various Nations and the facilities meet the same criteria for health, safety and access as do the Olympia facilities.
