Difference between revisions of "Big Questions"
From civicintelligence
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* What does it mean to be intelligent collectively versus individually? | * What does it mean to be intelligent collectively versus individually? | ||
* How can — or ''could'' — ''Civic Intelligence'' combat apathy, both on an individual and group level? | * How can — or ''could'' — ''Civic Intelligence'' combat apathy, both on an individual and group level? | ||
| − | * How would one recognize and ultimately even ''measure'' ''Civic Intelligence?'' | + | * [[measuring civic intelligence | How would one recognize and ultimately even ''measure'' ''Civic Intelligence?'']] |
* Similarly, how can one compare two examples of "Civic Intelligence"? | * Similarly, how can one compare two examples of "Civic Intelligence"? | ||
* What is the role of the individual in ''Civic Intelligence''? | * What is the role of the individual in ''Civic Intelligence''? | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 12 May 2011
- What is Civic Intelligence?
- What role do ICT's play in Civic Intelligence?
- Where did the notion of Civic Intelligence originate?
- What does it mean to be intelligent collectively versus individually?
- How can — or could — Civic Intelligence combat apathy, both on an individual and group level?
- How would one recognize and ultimately even measure Civic Intelligence?
- Similarly, how can one compare two examples of "Civic Intelligence"?
- What is the role of the individual in Civic Intelligence?
- Can Civic Intelligence be measured? And, if so, how?
- Is there an absolute measure of "Civic Intelligence" or does it always depend on context?
- Does the notion of Civic Intelligence presuppose that we currently live in an unintelligent community? Or that our community is unable to intelligently utilize resources to better the community as a whole?
- How can "Civic Intelligence" help to change the course of this nation from being an individualistic society to being a true community.
- Is an informed community considered an intelligent community? How informed does a community have to be before they are considered intelligent?
- What parts of our current society need to be drastically changed in order to naturally cultivate civic intelligence?
- What is education? What is brain washing?
e-participation: list of questions for Douglas Schuler (From Austrian journalist, Angelika Ohland, May 9, 2011)
- How can an average citizen become a motor for innovation and the implementation of solutions by e-participation?
- Which technical tools does he need? And are they already available?
- How do deliberation networks function? Are there any rules, is there any control? Are there any barriers to participation?
- How can we organize a deliberation process that matters and avoid ineffective talking without any results?
- How can collective thinking help to solve problems in the community? Do you know any examples for successful e-participation today?
- Food shortages, despoiled natural resources, economic inequality, wars, dictatorship: Is collective reasoning also able to help to solve global problems?
- What are the characteristic traits of civic intelligence? And on the contrary: How would you describe civic ignorance?
- What do people have to know and to learn for being able to deliberate?
- How influencial are age, education, income, regional and cultural factors?
- How can ordinary people with little education become a part of the deliberating community?
- How can we increase the inclusiveness of e-participation?
- Which role will ordinary people play in the new civic society? And will the political and economic elites be less influencial in the future?
- Will e-participation implement more grassroot democracy?
- Deliberating networks do not have any democratic legitimation. Can this be changed? How can ideas be transformed into political action?
- Will e-participation change the political institutions?
- Do you think that citizens are interested in e-participation? Aren´t they busy enough taking care of their ordinary life? Aren´t they relieved if politicians and experts do the job for them?
- Lobbyists spend huge amounts of money to anticipate a debate about the danger of atomic power or the destructive influence of our consuming habits on the climate. Do ordinary people have a chance to see through these aggressive forms of anti-deliberation?
- And at last: Will we be smart enough, soon enough?
